13 April 2009

Article of the Week: 19 Apr

Congratulations to Ricardo Lansiquot, winner of Article of the Week (19 Apr)!
It May Be Time for the Fed to Go Negative
Discusses the idea of the Fed setting the interest rate to negative a number.

15 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13447231

This article deals with the IMF and the growing trust that is needed for the IMF to succeed and rescue our economy

Josh orell

April 13, 2009 at 2:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090413/ap_on_bi_ge/as_china_economy;_ylt=AhQ0Fujto2qmgZs0s5lw8SGyBhIF

This article deals with Chinas Financial situation, both good and bad, but also the risks that China is facing in terms of their stimulus package and how China has been able to rebound

Josh Orell

April 13, 2009 at 2:47 PM  
Anonymous Adam Koffler said...

http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/14/markets/thebuzz/index.htm?postversion=2009041412

This article puts things into a broad perspective. It tells the reader not to look too deep into the recent 25% stock surge over the last 5 weeks, or to think that the economy is just going to turn for the better on a dime. Yes, the peak of the crisis after AIG and Lehman Brothers collapsed may be long gone, but the economy is still going to struggle for some time. It may still be in a declining state, but at a lesser rate than before. The article sums it up well; "the economy may not be as rainy or sunny as most think. Prepare for more months of mixed data."

April 15, 2009 at 12:53 AM  
Anonymous Andrew Thompson said...

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_12/b4124018582044.htm?chan=top+news_economics+subindex+page_economics

This article clearly shows the intensity of the debate over the stimulus plan. The point that the article seems to be trying to make is that although many economists, as well as the Obama administration, think this plan is the best idea, there are many respectable economists who are on the other side of the fence.

April 15, 2009 at 11:15 AM  
Anonymous David DeVries said...

http://www.economist.com/finance/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13447643&source=hptextfeature

The Fed is independent but due to its influx in regulation in the markets congress passed a non binding bill for auditing the fed. this is not substantial but could it be the first wave to try to bring more regulation to the fed and its activities?

April 15, 2009 at 11:38 AM  
Blogger david said...

http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/15/real_estate/obama_mortgage_plan/index.htm?postversion=2009041610

Where is this money coming from? I think its kind of hilarious that companies are "signing up" to be bailed out. The real estate business is one of the more complex to fix. Not sure if Obama is doing more good than harm

April 16, 2009 at 11:49 AM  
Anonymous Eugene Gimose said...

Elizabeth Warren details how much taxpayer money ($600billion) has been sent to Wall Street and what they've done with it.

April 19, 2009 at 2:52 AM  
Blogger Ricardo said...

First article is about the the idea of the Fed setting the interest rate to negative number

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/business/economy/19view.html?em

Second article talks about problems Bankers see with the government's stress test

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fi-stress-tests19-2009apr19,0,655575.story

April 19, 2009 at 3:26 PM  
Anonymous Jake Niemyer said...

http://www.newsweek.com/id/194612
This article proposes the idea that U.S. banks will not only recover from this crisis, but will emerge stronger than ever. With the advantage of generous bailout packages and toxic asset relief programs from the U.S. government, the titans of American banking will once again rule capitalism.

April 19, 2009 at 6:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13491933

This article discusses the effects of home-ownership on the homeowner and how those effects are not always positive even though the economics benefits may be.

April 19, 2009 at 11:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123792991709930321.html

This article deals with new proposals and ideas in creating new tax revenues in order to save money

Josh Orell

April 19, 2009 at 11:32 PM  
Blogger Sobia Ijaz said...

Buckle Down
http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13496802

This article discusses that despite some optimism deflation still remains a threat . Also once recovery from the recession does make its way, it will not be quick and easy, rather a painful and slow period.

April 19, 2009 at 11:48 PM  
Blogger Sobia Ijaz said...

The Audacity of Hope
http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13496794

Similar to my last post about things getting worse before they get better, in regards to the economy. This article specifically discusses the situation of banks, and how it is still possible for them to get worse, before they begin their climb uphill.

April 19, 2009 at 11:57 PM  
Blogger adriana lopez said...

This article discusses how economists have failed in large part to predict economic downturns. It brings to light too how some leading economists base their theories on their political affiliation.

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_17/b4128026997269_page_3.htm

April 20, 2009 at 12:02 AM  
Anonymous Eugene Gimose said...

US banks claim line softened on $74bn

May 11, 2009 at 2:43 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home